It seems like your proposal should say with Agoran Consent where it says without.
Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran consent. Unless I missed a rule where CAN = cannot this would mean at any time a player could simply declare a chamber as not a chamber. so shouldn't it read: Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber with Agoran consent. or Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran objection. ? cdm014
