2008/6/17 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The following sentence is a win announcement, as defined in Rule > 2186, and this sentence serves to explicitly label it as one. > > The Call for Judgement with ID number 1980 is a tortoise, and has > continuously been a tortoise for no greater than four and no less > than two weeks. > > The sentence before this one is a correct announcement explicitly > labeled as a win announcement, and it is a win announcement that > a tortoise (namely CFJ 1980) has continuously been a tortoise for > no greater than two and no less than four weeks. Therefore, by > rule 2110, I satisfy the Winning Condition of Paradox. > > I satisfy at least one Winning Condition and no Losing Conditions; > therefore, by rule 2186, I win the game. > > (Evidence: the question of veracity of CFJ 1980 was judged > UNDECIDABLE on 3 June 2008 20:28:45 GMT, and the CFJ is about the > possibility of a rule-defined action; the question has had a > judgement of UNDECIDABLE continuously since then, so the CFJ was > then and has always been since then a tortoise. That time was > between 2 and 4 weeks ago.) > -- > ais523 >
Congratumalatarafanasulatations! ehird
