ihope wrote: > So, um, a contract caused a win by paradox by saying "if it's X, it > becomes Y; if it's Y, it becomes Z; if it's Z, it becomes X; if it's > X, stuff can happen", which is merely ambiguous? > > Note to self, then: jump on top of every ambiguity, and always appeal > judgements of UNDECIDABLE. No, it is a paradox (or at least the statement was incapable of being correctly described as true or false, which is what UNDECIDABLE means); however, I'd say that if something is paradoxical, it is not unambiguously true. -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
