E is only allowed to create or destroy land according to the contract. (I'm assuming)
The contract states in order to create the land e must revoke 3 points. Ergo, there is an argument to be made that announcing the creation of the land, is also a de jure announcement that e has revoked the points. The later announcement that the points have been revoked might not be false depending on if an "on or about" clause was present and if the about could extend backwards to the point of the announcing the land had been created. In this case it would be the same as making the two announcements via separate emails and having the second arrive first. However, I'm not the judge on the CFJ (yet). -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
