comex wrote: > On 6/18/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I submit the following proposal, titled "Repeal Partnerships" (AI=2, II=0): > > I wouldn't support repealing partnerships altogether-- for example, > the AFO provides a nice place for Murphy and I to store crops-- but > there are definitely some negatives: > - large numbers of scam partnerships makes a lot of scams possible > that otherwise would require a very large number of people > - partnerships like the AFO mean that many scams that would otherwise > require cooperation can be done by one person (this increases scams' > potential destructiveness and, to be honest, makes them less > interesting) > > How about: a person can only be part of one partnership at a time, > partnerships only become eligible to register 24 hours after they > become public? This would make things a little more sane while > keeping partnerships in the rules. I don't really like that. Personally, I'd prefer it if there were a way to restrict things to /interesting/ partnerships, like the PerlNomic Partnership, which I don't want to lose. -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
