On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Anyway, I think it could be 'not envisioned'. I mean, obviously I was
> aware that it was
> *possible* that someone could deregister me, but I hoped (and
> believed) that it wouldn't
> happen - since anyone looking at it would realise it's not a novelty
> to discover it could
> be used to deregister me. I was hoping for things like what Murphy and
> ais523 did, those
> were what I envisioned.
Gratuitous: my first thought was: "I should deregister em. Naw, that's
boring." But the fact that it was (apparently) the first thought of
many who read it might mean it should have been envisioned as likely.
-Goethe.
