2008/6/26 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Gratuitous argument: a reasonable person wouldn't agree to be bound by > a contract so that restricted eir behavior in such a way. (On the > other hand, "would cause" seems a bit weak; if it was worded "might > cause" there might be a stronger argument for GUILTY, but it was > hardly inevitable that agreeing to the pledge would result in an > impaired ability to judge CFJs.) >
The pledge didn't restrict my behaviour at all. And I agree with your wording concerns. The current wording protects me. ehird
