On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > I initiate a criminal case against ehird, for violating Rule 2149 by > saying that e joins. In fact, as e knew, the statement was > ineffective (because e deregistered less than thirty days prior to > it), so e did not join at any time around the posting of the message.
Of course, assuming eir registration wasn't effective, this will run smack into the conflict between R2149 and R101; the fact that e deregistered rather than continuing to play, as was is right. There's not even a contract involved, and I'd say a non-player who wasn't bound by a specific contract covering the matter is indeed protected from punishment by R101. -Goethe ps. thanks for coming clean, e-not-rid-hird.
