On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 10:14 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement: "ais523 was a person on Agora's birthday." > > Argument against: By eir own admission, e was not capable of > communicating in English via email during Agora's birthday. > > --Wooble Heh, I hope that comes up FALSE too, it would cause a massive gamestate recalculation based on unknown data due to all the assets that are restricted to people (there must be some), and the precedent that non-persons cannot be parties to contracts. There are a huge number of occasions in the past where I couldn't communicate in English via email too, and unfortunately I haven't kept track of them, so this would lead us to a hugely unknown gamestate. (Do none of you lot ever sleep either? Maybe all of us have been non-persons at some point.
Oh, and if this does lead to a massive gamestate recalculation, I suggest fixing it by proposal, if still possible. (This also just reiterates to me that we need some form of my emergency exit proposal; would someone care to proto or propose a fixed version? Was it just the II people didn't like?) -- ais523
