On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Sgeo wrote: >> Keeping in mind there are some who have frowned upon legislative play too, >> and believe 1 person/1 vote and no bribery for all proposals should be >> relatively sacred. And of course those who don't mind bribing judges :). > > I fully support legislative play for ordinary decisions, but not > democratic decisions. As far as I'm concerned, the point of the > distinction is to have a playground for decisions on things that won't > completely change things, but when there are important things going > on, to have an unspoiled democracy.
I'm working on a proto that brings back the three-tiered Ordinary-> Democratic -> Sane. Along with cards. Stay tuned. But yes, I fully agree that there should *always* be a high-powered "safe mode" that is a straight-up single-vote poll of biological persons in the game. -Goethe
