On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:59 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not really. You make the contract a partnership, have all the parties >> sponsor it, and require it to cast the exact number of votes you'd >> have cast under the old system. Result: same system we have now, with >> an added layer of annoyance. > > Repeal partnerships >
Sadly that doesn't solve this problem (though I support the suggestion for other reasons). The big issue is that under the hypothetical scheme, the effective vote power P of sets of players has the property P(S u T) - P(S) = VVLOD(T) (for |S| >=2). Thus, the effective bargaining power every non-empty set of players (with any other non-empty set of players) is always equal to their (summed) VVLOD. That's boring. -woggle
