On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Strongly object. Experimenting with the lack of a requirement to > consult the other partners has been the point of the AFO from day one.
And the mere existence of this equity case shows that one partner wasn't happy with that arrangement, even if e changed eir mind once e filed this CFJ and you returned the assets. I'm not sure why this CFJ wasn't retracted before the pre-trial phase ended.
