On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > a) An attempted speech act is equivalent to a claim that the > person will perform the action by sending the message.
Why on earth are we codifying this? For years, we have not punished folks for merely failing to perform an action. The new interpretation seems to say we do now. This is Wrong, Chilling, etc., and should be fixed if the rules support it. Or am I misreading this clause entirely? Do I really have to include a disclaimer in every action? That's very Un-Agoran. -Goethe
