ais523 wrote:
> I attempt to file a criminal CFJ against ais523 for violating rule 2149
> for lying by incorrectly saying in this message that they failed to
> initiate a CFJ when they didn't, but fail.
I'm interpreting this as failing due to ambiguity (Rules 1504 and 2208).
Proto-Proposal: Long-term ambiguity considered harmful
Create a rule titled "Long-term ambiguity considered harmful" with this
text:
A person acting to create an ambiguity in the gamestate SHOULD
act to minimize the scope of the ambiguity.
[Example: your message could have been followed by this text:
"I retract any judicial cases previously initiated in this
message. I initiate an inquiry case on the statement 'A
criminal case was initiated in the same message in which
this case was initiated.'"]
