On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought I'd protoed a new judgement for "X did something that > violates Z" - OVERGENERAL, perhaps? Feel free to propose it.
I though put in a proposal to require people to specify which action violates the rule... -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
