On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I support this.  The precedent from CFJ 1738 is that speech acts do
> carry truth values.  Additionally, I know of no precedent stating what
> Taral claims.
>
> The action having received two support, I hereby appeal CFJ 2048.

Um, did you just attempt to act on someone else's intent of action?
That there's criminal, that is.

-Goethe



Reply via email to