On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: >>I CFJ on this statement. > > Patently TRUE. By stating it you do in fact initiate the described CFJ, > via the rules on acting by announcement. This makes the statement true. > And it's obviously relevant.
That's what I thought too. I was actually surprised not to find an existing case like this in the CotC database, especially considering all the CFJs with statements along the lines of "This is a CFJ." -root
