comex wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I initiate a criminal CFJ: >>> - defendant: comex >>> - rule: 2149 >>> - action: claiming in eir message with message-id >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that e >>> intended to appeal ehird's judgement of CFJ 1932, while in fact he did >>> not intend to appeal it >> I refuse these last two. Slow down, cowboy! > > Too bad, that last one was interesting. > > The AFO intends a criminal CFJ identical to the above.
Partnerships can't initiate criminal cases, either.
