On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, the conflict is directly between R3.1 and R101. The conflict resolution > is *defined* by R1482 as favoring R3.1. This works fine, just as having a > simple definition of a term in a lower powered rule works to modify the action > between two high-powered rules in other cases. (In other words, there's no > inherent conflict between R101 and R1482 to consider).
If R101 says that R101 takes precedence over R3.1, and R1482 says that R3.1 takes precedence over R101, that is a conflict, and R101 wins. Whether R101 does indeed claim to take precedence is debatable.
