On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 19:12, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I intend, with the consent of the rest of the panel, to REMAND this >>> case to Sgeo, so that e might judge the case again while thinking more >>> clearly, and also consider the precedent of CFJ 1771. >> >> Appeals are support (not consent) now, so you probably need to do that >> to a public forum. Nevertheless, I support that intent. > > The quoted intent was sent to a public forum. >
Hm. Indeed it was. Apparently, I'm bad a reading...
