On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 15:10, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> ais523 wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE >> > I vote as follows >> >> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test >> > FORx1 (it's Democratic). >> >> Since the PNP is not Promotor, the alleged distribution did not >> distribute that proposal, and may or may not have submitted it. > Yes, I was just wondering what would happen. Another case for the > courts, I expect, just not sure how to word it.
The PNP should conditionally retract the proposal, which will work well enough. -woggle
