On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:04 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arguably, there are two requirements: the CotC SHALL assign an ID > number, and the CotC SHALL assign the smallest possible legal ID number. > The Monster was deputising based on the first, not on the second.
It doesn't matter what e was deputising "based on", the fact remains that Rule 2161 says that assigning a number less than any existing orderly number is INVALID, and R2193's CAN doesn't override that; 2161 is Power 2 and 2193 is Power 1.
