On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2008/9/20 ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Quite possibly that would violate R101. >> -- >> ais523 >> > If it does then so does the 5 CFJ thing
That's why the wording of R101 clause is as it is; if you're told "you can re-initiate on the same subject next week" then you still have a reasonable expectation of resolution with minor delay (but still in reasonable time). I think there's a precedent on that somewhere? On the other hand, if there's a type of CFJ subject that can be refused indefinitely, that would violate R101. -Goethe
