On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 23:50 -0400, Sgeo wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve > >> to escape from situations where the normal proposal system doesn't work, > >> maybe after seeing it happen to B Nomic at least twice in the last year. > > > > B doesn't have Rule 1698, which is such a safety valve. > > > Agora could get such that it is incredible difficult, but not > impossible, to make a change to the ruleset..
I brought up this point last time, and the Annabel Crisis was given as an example to support my point (that it's possible for the gamestate to be such that it's possible to change the ruleset but nobody is sure how). -- ais523
