On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 18:05 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > Ah, this might be where it breaks down in Agora. The point is that as I > > haven't reached my CFJ limit yet, there's no way that the attempt to > > call a CFJ can fail, except for some other part of the transaction > > failing. > > And in fact it does fail because of how it's disclaimered. > > > So in B this leads to a contradiction either way. > > Why would B resolve it differently? > You can't disclaimer actions out of existence in B. Transactions are special-cased by the ruleset. -- ais523
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report Charles Reiss
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Re... Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agricultur... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agricu... Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of A... Roger Hicks
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary ... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agricultur... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agricu... ais523
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of A... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary ... ais523
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary ... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agricultur... Ed Murphy
- DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report Roger Hicks
- DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report Ian Kelly
- DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report Roger Hicks
- DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report ais523

