On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 18:05 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> 
> > Ah, this might be where it breaks down in Agora. The point is that as I
> > haven't reached my CFJ limit yet, there's no way that the attempt to
> > call a CFJ can fail, except for some other part of the transaction
> > failing.
> 
> And in fact it does fail because of how it's disclaimered.
> 
> > So in B this leads to a contradiction either way.
> 
> Why would B resolve it differently?
> 
You can't disclaimer actions out of existence in B. Transactions are
special-cased by the ruleset.
-- 
ais523

Reply via email to