woggle wrote:
>> woggle, I think you also still need to choose a sentence for CFJ 2107:
>
> I'm not certain that anything happened which made CFJ 2107's judicial
> question on sentencing cease to have the judgment FINE (as far as I
> know, the appeal only suspending the judgment on culpability...)
>
> Regardless, if possible, I recuse myself from CFJ 2107.
Hmm. From Rule 1504:
A criminal case has a judicial question on sentencing, which is
applicable if the question on culpability is applicable and has
a judgement of GUILTY. If a criminal case has an applicable
question on sentencing which has a judgement, the defendant is
hereafter known as the ninny, the judgement in the question on
sentencing is known as the sentence, and the sentence is in
effect.
so the question on sentencing became inapplicable when the previous
GUILTY judgement was set aside, but became applicable again when the
new GUILTY judgement was delivered; and the judgement of the question
on sentencing stuck around during all that time, becoming ineffective
and then effective again.
