On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, comex wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:49 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:46 -0400, comex wrote: >>> Issue 1 - "clear indication" >> Dependent actions don't require a "clear indication" nowadays, but need >> to be "previously unambiguously described". Quite possibly this makes a >> difference. > > Still, you have to announce your intent, which also requires that the > action be "unambiguously specified" (R478), which brings us into the > whole CFJ 1307 mess.
That has to do with a case where an action was clearly visible, but tried to use "all" in place of a number to specify units. That's really different then a case where the sentence is clearly written but hidden/buried in unrelated text. I think there's been cases where actions have been hidden in reports before and not questioned on this particular issue. -Goethe
