On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could record this in the database as three separate assigns (similar > to appeal panels, a holdover from the old justices / appellate judges > system) but I'm concerned that it might confuse some of the scripts. I > recommend the following instead (the case can still be appealed):
I have to say I disagree with preventing interesting rule changes due to arbitrary technical limitations...can't you fix the scripts?
