On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:34 -0400, ihope wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:29 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you should probably also make ratification self-ratifying; that
> > is, ratifications self-ratify as having worked. Otherwise, we could end
> > up in meta-ratification mixups...
>
> It would be weird if all self-ratifications were self-ratifying.
> Self-ratifications aren't public messages, though, so they can't be
> ratified.
>
I'm talking about ordinary ratifications self-ratifying, not
self-ratifications. IOW, if someone publishes that a ratification
worked, that self-ratifies as being true.
--
ais523
