On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:12 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > You just ratified oklopol as a player, the Monster as a player, and
> >> > Zefram as on hold.
> >>
> >> The important thing is that I ratified myself as a player.
> >>
> > Wow, I missed that one altogether. A nice trivial scam...
>
> Is it even possible to ratify playerhood given the precedent of CFJ
> 1856? R101 takes precedence over R1551.
>
> Also, I thought Zefram *was* on hold.
>
I don't think R101's relevant here when a contract isn't involved (one
was in the case of CFJ 1856). It would, probably, prevent me ratifying
the IIB as a player, as its personness is in doubt for
contract-law-related reasons.
--
ais523
