On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 21 Oct 2008, at 00:09, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> It also means that "fishing expeditions" led by non-members armed >> with the potential name of a contract (but nothing more) should be >> discouraged by the Rules lest the means become a burden. I hope the >> current case does so discourage. > > Scam plotting and such should be allowed by the rules as you say but finding > out scams should be allowed too.
Not at the cost of severe annoyance through the courts when the actions in question are legal anyway. Say you constantly put forth a stream of CFJs that alleged "Goethe is a member of 1 secret agreement" "2 secret agreements" "3 secret agreements" with no or limited proof. We have no power to subpoena private emails and I would prefer not to start or suggest that our courts have that power. -G.
