On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:56 AM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But if the Terre Haute is "the Terre Haute", then it is a string, >> which exists independently of the contract, so the contract cannot >> make it an asset. > > Wait, that doesn't follow. "The Terre Haute" was defined to be the > *name* of the asset, not the asset itself. If you are claiming that > the string of characters actually becomes the asset, then you need to > justify why that happens.
Because if Rochelle O'Shea owns an asset, the Terre Haute is the name of that asset. --Warrigal of Escher
