On 9 Nov 2008, at 04:05, Ed Murphy wrote:
ehird, with the position explained this way, do you still disagree with it as vehemently?
I still disagree (just because someone does some stuff that generally recordkeepors do doesn't mean that the person specified as the recordkeepor isn't) but now I see that the
argument isn't about wishy-washy intent. -- ehird
