ehird wrote: > 2008/11/17 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Possibly, the declaration of invalidity did not work.. I remember some >> rule against tampering with these things, though that might be from >> Canada.. >> > > There is a rule specifically allowing ballots to be declared invalid.
You may as well say "if the previous parts of the scam worked" up front, otherwise someone else is going to say it in response anyway.
