root wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> root wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Elliott Hird
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I agree to the following:
>>>> {
>>>> This is a public contract and a pledge.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone can join or leave this contract.
>>>>
>>>> Votes of the form RANDOM(vote), RANDOM(vote,vote), RANDOM(vote,vote,vote)
>>>> and so on are
>>>> conditional votes resolving to one of the votes randomly.
>>>> }
>>> If I were Assessor, I would consider such votes to not clearly
>>> identify one of the available options.
>> As Assessor, the AFO intends to perform and announce random selections
>> during the voting period as needed to resolve these.
>
> What happens if somebody else randomly selects one first?
The rules are silent on this issue. I suppose it would go to CFJ,
at least if the overall outcome depended on it.
