On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto (AI=2?)
>
> The CotC CAN declare a potential CFJ statement as Malformed by
> an announcement specifying eir reasons for doing so. E SHOULD
> only do so if the construction or means of calling the potential
> CFJ created substantial uncertainty as to its status as a CFJ.
> A Malformed potential CFJ remains Malformed for one week, during
> which the CotC is under no obligation to perform actions with
> respect to it. After one week, a Malformed CFJ ceases to be a
> be a CFJ or potential CFJ of any kind.
>
> A person may make a Malformed CFJ cease to be Malformed with
> two support, in which case the CotC CANNOT make it Malformed
> again as described above.
Buggy. First the Malformed thing is "a potential CFJ statement", then
it's a "potential CFJ", then it's just a "CFJ". But a malformed
statement was never actually turned into a CFJ...
Proto-proto:
The initiator of a CFJ is generally the person who initiated it.
However, the CotC CAN create an inquiry case by announcement
identifying any person as its initiator, as well as a subclass
and all parameters generally necessary to initiate a case of
that subclass. The CotC SHALL only do this for the purpose of
reducing ambiguity.
