On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 13:21 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> By the way, in just reading about error ratings on concurring opinions, >>> I can't tell if 1 is supposed to be good and 99 bad or vice versa? >> >> Considering it doesn't do anything at all, it probably doesn't matter. >> It's been in the rule for over a year and is almost never used. > > Agreed on this. The only error rating I ever gave was on a 99-is-bad > scale; however, the fact that error ratings don't do anything means it > doesn't matter at all.
I'd say it matters because (if used) it would have an impact on how I read or weighted a precedent. -Goethe
