ehird wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2009, at 15:02, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>
>> The best I can do for this case is impose a judgment that makes
>> further delays subject to NoVs. So I publish this judgment:
>>
>> {ehird SHALL either: (1) Publish the required report of the PBoA
>> every week, as long as e is responsible for doing so under the PBoA
>> contract; or (2) deregister as soon as possible. For the week in
>> which this judgment is published, ehird SHALL publish the required
>> report of the PBoA as soon as possible.}
>
> I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment. I have already
> stated that I will resume PBA tracking activities if I can, and
> deregistering is a grossly harsh punishment for such a non-activity.
Gratuituous: Failing to deregister won't get you dinged any harder
than failing to publish the report, so this is no worse than a
straightforward "ehird SHALL publish on time" etc. (and technically
better, as it gives you an additional option, though probably not a
very useful one in practice).
