On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 18:00, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Charles Reiss wrote:
>> Which reminds me, one needs to consider how to deal with a corporation
>> owning its own shares.
>
> Manumission?

When real corporations do this, it's to decrease the number of shares
in circulation (and thereby increase the value of existing
shares/decrease net dividends payout if dividends are constant per
share).

I suppose the outcome isn't too bad if this is not treated as a
special case, a corporation owning a majority stake in itself would
effectively lock out action expect by means allowed by the
corporation's contract (assuming we allow that mechanism; if we don't
then this is obviously a problem), but to maintain this, the
corporation would need to pay a  (hopefully) non-trivial upkeep cost.

-woggle

Reply via email to