On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Caplan <[email protected]> wrote: > The theory, I think, is that the timing, though not significant in > itself, /indicates/ an underlying situation that is significant. (This > situation is analogous to how messages sent to a-d can be used as > evidence of intent or consent.) > > comex seems to be arguing that, by prosecuting eagerly and not issuing a > reasonable reminder, you indicated that your true motive is not to see > the rules followed, but rather to see comex punished.
In this case, I just happened to be looking at Zenith to check if the cases involving R2238 were worded such that they'd clarify whether ais523 successfully created any Notes, as I was trying to keep the Conductor report up to date despite the office being vacant. I noticed that a case had been platonically remanded to me, and had no opportunity to warn anyone about it as the deadline had already passed. For the late report NoVs, I try to keep the IADoP report up-to-date as reports are published, but only check for late reports shortly after 0:00 UTC on Mondays in compiling the note rewards for the previous week. I could check it earlier than that and spam the lists with lists of reports that haven't been published yet this week/month.
