On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:10 -0500, Sgeo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 13:54 -0500, Sgeo wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > I award the patent title Three Months Long Service to H. Assessor AFO. > >> > > >> > --IADoP Wooble > >> > > >> > >> For its service as the Assessor of Agora Nomic, the AFO has been > >> awarded the Patent Title of Three Months Long Service. > > > > Incidentally, are you going to report my and the AFO's wins by > > Dictatorship? I think those are pretty uncontroversial, even if the > > escalation that's part of the same scam isn't. > > Is the dictatorship itself under "Ending the Dictatorship"? I don't > see another mention of a dictatorship.
Yes, it sets off Win by Dictatorship for me and the AFO as soon as the rule's amended to claim to let us make arbitrary rule changes, regardless of whether the rule is powerful enough to do so. So regardless of whether either of the escalations worked (what's sparking off the arguments)< me and the AFO won (and the passing of the proposal has now self-ratified, due to a secondary scam). However, comex didn't win because e had Rests at the time. -- ais523
