In the matter of CFJ 2378, I judge the question to be undetermined. According to cfj 1744:
[CFJ 1744 (called 18 September 2007): It is not the job of the judge to hunt down or request the information that would be required to render a substantive judgement.] The callers arguments provided insufficient reference to an earlier CFJ which the caller believes to be relevant to the case. I also find it to be impossible to judge the qualities of a non-existent entity, specifically rule 2238, which does not appear in the FLR at the time of my research into the matter. And I saw no evidence it was in existence a the time this inquiry was called. Chester Mealer cdm...@gmail.com
