On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:56 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> Notice of Violation: > >> Actor: ehird. > >> Action: Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error, > >> shame, > >> remorse, and ardent desire for self-improvement, ASAP after > >> being sentenced to GUILTY/APOLOGY in CFJ 2347. > >> Rule violated: 1504 > > > > I contest this. NoVing someone immediately upon joining is very rude. > > E ceased to play for a month, let em be. > > I initiate a criminal case on the above notice. > > Arguments: The defendant directly insulted the judge who sentenced > em and then deregistered, perhaps to avoid punishment. The fact that e > imposed exile on emself was eir own choice, not the court's, and > shouldn't be a mitigating factor (see: the meaningfulness of deciding > on one's own punishment). If we don't believe an APOLOGY is meaningful, > we should get rid of the language that supports it, not allow it to be > turned into a mockery of the civil society it attempts to represent. -G. > I think the above notice might be invalid; isn't Failure to Apologise a defined Crime?
-- ais523
