I wrote: > ais523 can act on Murphy's behalf to cause Murphy to support > ais523's own intent to make Einos > (http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/) a protectorate.
Gratuituous arguments: > But contracts have been the only mechanism by which we have thus far > allowed act-on-behalf where it is clearly and immediately obvious who > is acting on behalf of whom, Seems obvious enough to me that ais523 was to act on behalf of me. > In other precedents (the non-binding > contract), act-on-behalf has been considered a type of obligation, What other precedents? I can't remember any, and I'm pretty sure we've had precedents that they work (hence TRUE) but can't be pursued in equity court if abused. Gratuituous evidence: ais523 allegedly acted on my behalf to cause me to support at Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:50:25 +0000 (about 50 seconds before this case was initiated). If successful, this may lead to FALSE on the grounds that I couldn't support a second time. I retracted permission at Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:56:31 -0800 (about 16 seconds after this case was initiated).
