On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > The provision about rests is unnecessary; as the Agora Corporation is a > second-class person.
Indeed. Let's make it "Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the voting limit of Agora Corporation on an ordinary decision is 8, if no member of its basis possesses any Rests." > The Corporation should also have a basis; it seems appropriate for it to > be the empty set. How about making it the singleton set containing only the CEO? Alternatively, let people join and leave it relatively freely, but limit the number of AGRA they can own if they're not in it. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Elliott Hird <[email protected]> wrote: > The point? It's yet another of my schemes to give Agora a fungible, liquid, relatively stable currency. --Warrigal
