Yally wrote: > 1. Much of the history section is inconsistent and incomplete. > 2. Publishing the history section is not required by the rules or any > CFJs to my knowledge. > 3. The Registrar's report was, in my opinion, unnecessarily long. The > history dominated the report. And Agora is only accumulating more history. > 4. It didn't really represent any pertinent data. The history isn't > going to change. > 5. No information was lost. All information that would be present in the > history logs is still present and accessible.
The logs are not permanent (we lost several years worth when escribe.com died). If you want to de-spam the weekly report, I suggest publishing the history monthly (I think that's been done before).
