On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > All persons are encouraged to submit a CFJ to the Justiciar only > when there is a good reason not to submit it to the Clerk of the > Courts.
So we should always submit our CFJs to the Justiciar since submitting them to the CotC doesn't actually initiate a CFJ, which is a very good reason not to do it? Is this a new era of secret CFJs and a flooding of a Justiciar's private email? Of course, it's not clear that submitting a CFJ to the Justiciar without publishing it initiates a CFJ either. And if they weren't the same person, how would the CotC know that a published CFJ wasn't also submitted to the Justiciar?
