On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 15:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/5/20 Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk>: > > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 17:05 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> > coppro 3 3 6 3 7 0 2 2 1 1 4 2 34 > >> > >> > 18 May 2009 00:00:00 - coppro +D gained points, +D# awarded points, +E > >> > judgment, +F# weekly duties, +C# AI=2 +G# X>Y=0 > >> > >> CoE: AI=2 is not a condition for the gaining of a Note, and I never > >> gained a C# note. > >> > >> I publish an NoV accusing Tiger of violating the 1-power Rule 2143 by > >> publishing that I possessed 1 more C# note than I did in eir most recent > >> Conductor's Report. > > > > I contest this, it was most likely an honest mistake and therefore not > > illegal. > > > History isn't officially included in the report anyway. Or does > everything I claim to be part of the report count when it comes to > "SHALL NOT publish inaccurate information"? Because in that case I'd > almost rather put the history in a separate inofficial report to > a-d... But I guess there's not really any mistake I can make about > that would really get me punished.
Ah, that contesting was on the assumption that the main body of the report was actually wrong; if it wasn't, that's an even better reason to contest. Putting incorrect history in a report doesn't violate the report rules (unless you put an incorrect last-ratified date in); it may violate truthfulness, but only if you were intentionally being misleading. So you're fine about accidental mistakes in history, with my understanding of the rules. -- ais523
