On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Charles Walker<[email protected]> wrote: > I judge CFJs 2561-2565 FALSE, citing the evidence given and the third > paragraph of R869: > A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or > prevented by the rules) register by announcing that e registers, > wishes to register, requests registration, or requests > permission to register. > > None of these methods were used before the seventh sentence in allispaul's > message. However, if Quazie hasn't transfered those props yet, e still owes > allispaul two of them. > > -- > C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public. >
Does Quazie really owe allispaul two props? Quazie's pledge included the phrase "and future suggestions that may occur," which was not (though almost impossible) followed as I added more suggestions after Paul's registration. For the second prop, the pledge contained "properly CFJ" and it was pointed out that one cannot link CFJs unless one is the CotC. hmm. Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
