On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 18:16 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/6/6 Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com>: > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgment as homonyms (and hence > > the bad puns used here) are not a valid means of interpreting a statement. > > Typo rule, you... you uncouth... person!
I'm pretty sure R754 isn't that general. In particular, it doesn't allow typos that cause ambiguities (and Murphy has been diligently ignoring votes of AGAINT ever since). -- ais523
